Authorship Collaboration of Scientific Publications on Spinal Stenosis: A Scientometric Study

Authors

  • Victoria. P Department of Library and Information Science Periyar University, Salem Author
  • E.S.Kavitha Department of Library and Information Science Periyar University, Salem Author

Keywords:

Scientometric, Spinal Stenosis, Surgery, Low back pain, Web of science

Abstract

The study concentrated on authorship patterns and collaboration in spinal stenosis exploration as reflected in the Web of Science database for 2017 – 2021. The data was interpreted using software similar to Bibexcel and Vosviewer and tabulated using MS Excel. The results indicated that 3044 papers were published during 2017 – 2021, and the loftiest number of publications, 667(21.91), was produced in 2020. The study uses colorful scientometrics approaches to present authorship and cooperative patterns for authors, keywords, time series analysis, Relative growth rate and doubling time, and co-authorship indicator. We find multi- and mega-author benefactions that are added and dominate the Spinal stenosis exploration. In the case of cooperative patterns, we set up a domestic collaboration, which dominates the spinal stenosis exploration compared to transnational collaborations. The publication geste of experimenters shows that they're primarily picky in publishing the exploration results in specialized papers. The collaborative indicator (5.008) was produced in 2020. And also, collaborative co-efficient papers have increased (0.76) thrice in 2017, 2020, and 2021.

Keywords: Scientometric, Spinal Stenosis, Surgery, Low back pain, Web of science

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boopathi, P., & Gomathi, P. (2019). Scientometric analysis of diabetes research output during the year 2014-2018: Indexed by web of science. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac.

Chen, Y. C., Kuo, C. H., Cheng, C. M., & Wu, J. C. (2019). Recent advances in the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: bibliometric analysis and surgical perspectives: JNSPG 75th Anniversary Invited Review Article. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 31(3), 299-309. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.5.SPINE18769

Cheng, Y., Zhou, L., & Hai, Y. (2022). Comments on “the 100 most cited articles on lumbar spinal stenosis: a bibliometric analysis.” Global Spine J by Yin M et al. Global Spine Journal, 12(1), 183-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682211034775

4. Fonseca, P., Goethel, M., Vilas-Boas, J. P., Gutierres, M., & Correia, M. V. (2021). A Bibliometric analysis of intraoperative neuromonitoring in spine surgery. World Neurosurgery,154,3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.039.

Genevay, S., & Atlas, S. J. (2010). Lumbar spinal stenosis. Best practice & research Clinical rheumatology, 24(2), 253-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2009.11.001.

Kiliçaslan, Ö. F., Nabi, V., Yardibi, F., Tokgöz, M. A., & Köse, Ö. (2021). Research tendency in lumbar spinal stenosis over the past decade: a bibliometric analysis. World Neurosurgery,149,e71-e84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.086.

Kiliçaslan, Ö. F., Nabi, V., Yardibi, F., Tokgöz, M. A., & Köse, Ö. (2021). Research tendency in lumbar spinal stenosis over the past decade: a bibliometric analysis. World Neurosurgery,149,e71-e84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.086

Konur, O. (2018). Scientometric evaluation of the global research in spine: an update on the pioneering study by Wei et al. European Spine Journal, 27(3), 524-529.

Kurnakova, K. A., Plishchenko, I. K., & Ponomarenko, G. N. (2020). Physical factors in the rehabilitation of patients with the consequences of spinal cord injuries: scientometric analysis of evidence-based research. Voprosy Kurortologii, Fizioterapii, i Lechebnoi Fizicheskoi Kultury, 97(5), 80-91, https://doi.org/10.17116/kurort20209705180

Lin,G.X.,Kotheeranurak,V., ahatthanatrakul, A., Ruetten, S., Yeung, A., Lee, S. H., & Kim, J. S. (2020). Worldwide research productivity in the field of full-endoscopic spine surgery: a bibliometric study. European Spine Journal, 29(1), 153-160.

Long, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Pan, M., & Gao, Q. (2022). Exosomes in the Field of Neuroscience: A Scientometric Study and Visualization Analysis. Frontiers in Neurology, 13.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.871491.

12. Melancia, J. L., Francisco, A. F., & Antunes, J. L. (2014). Spinal stenosis. Handbook of clinical neurology, 119, 541-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7020-4086-3.00035-7.

Muthu, S., Jeyaraman, M., & Jeyaraman, N. (2022). Evolution of evidence in spinal surgery–past, present and future Scientometric analysis of randomized controlled trials in spinal surgery. World Journal of Orthopedics, 13(9), 853. http://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i9.853.

Rathika, N., & Thanuskodi, S. (2020). Research Output on Encephalitis Literature: A Scientometric Analysis During 2008 to 2017. In Challenges and Opportunities of Open Educational Resources Management (pp. 143-161). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3559-2.ch008.

Radhakrishnan, N. (2018). Research Contributions on Nephrology during 2010–2015: A Scientometric Approach. In Innovations in Measuring and Evaluating Scientific Information (pp. 199-212). IGI Global.

Sathiyapriya C & Gomathi P (2019). Scientometric Study on Immunology at National Level through Web of Science Database. library Philosophy and Practice(e-journal) https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac.

Victoria, P. & Gomathi P (2021). Research Output on Leprosy during the Year of 2010-2020: A Scientometric Analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice(e-journal). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac.

Wu, J. C., Ko, C. C., Yen, Y. S., Huang, W. C., Chen, Y. C., Liu, L., ... & Cheng, H. (2013). Epidemiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and its risk of causing spinal cord injury: a national cohort study. Neurosurgical focus, 35(1), E10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.4.FOCUS13122.

19. Yang, K., Pei, L., Wen, K., Zhou, S., & Tao, L. (2021). Investigating Research Hotspots and Publication Trends of Spinal Stenosis: A Bibliometric Analysis During 2000–2018. Frontiers in Medicine, 8.

http://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.556022.

Yang, K., Pei, L., Wen, K., Zhou, S., & Tao, L. (2021). Investigating Research Hotspots and Publication Trends of Spinal Stenosis: A Bibliometric Analysis During 2000–2018. Frontiers in Medicine, 8.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.556022

21. Yin, M., Wang, H., Sun, Y., Xu, C., Ye, J., Ma, J., ... & Mo, W. (2022). Global trends of researches on lumbar spinal stenosis: a bibliometric and visualization study. Clinical spine surgery, 35(1), E259-E266. http://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001160.

Yin, M., Xu, C., & Mo, W. (2022). The 100 most cited articles on lumbar spinal stenosis: a bibliometric analysis. Global spine journal, 12(3), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568220952074.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Authorship Collaboration of Scientific Publications on Spinal Stenosis: A Scientometric Study (V. P & E. Kavitha , Trans.). (2024). Journal of Indian Library Association, 60(02), 151-163. https://journal.ilaindia.net/index.php/lib/article/view/307