LEVERAGING SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS FOR LIBRARY SERVICES:  A CONJOINT ANALYSIS OF LIBRARY USERS’ PREFERENCES

Authors

  • Dixit Amar Rangnath U.E.S. Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Solapur (Maharashtra) Author
  • Gavali Vandana Santosh Walchand College of Arts and Science, Solapur (Maharashtra) Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34256/

Keywords:

Social Media Platform, Delivery Mechanism, Information Extension, Conjoint Analysis.

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to determine the preferences of college library users affiliated with Punyashlok Ahilya Devi Holkar Solapur University, Solapur, Maharashtra, regarding the use of social media platforms to access the information services provided by their college libraries. This study employed the conjoint analysis method to identify the most preferred attributes of social media platforms that are deemed significant for information retrieval by library users. The five attributes chosen include Social Media Platform, Delivery Mechanism, Information Extension, Messenger, and Interaction. Using SPSS software, a total of 192 profiles were generated, and from these, sixteen profiles were chosen for the responders. A survey was created and sent using Google Forms, and a total of 151 individuals completed the survey. The research findings are presented through the Model Summary Table, Coefficient Table, Part Worth Utility Table, and Relative Importance of Attributes. The study examined the relative importance of each attribute's choices and found that all attributes are substantially different, indicating that library customers are clear about their choices. Additionally, the study observed that the library users preferred prerecorded videos with basic information. As well as prefers subject experts over library staff, and prefers interactivity during information seeking. This study recommends that social media channels should be heavily used by college libraries in order to better serve their patrons. According to the readers' preferences, library patrons anticipate information from professionals in YouTube videos.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ariel, Y., & Avidar, R. (2015). Information, interactivity, and social media. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2015.972404

Baglione, S. L., & Sullivan, K. (2016). Technology and textbooks: The future. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1186466

Bakare, O. A., Yacob, H., & Umar, M. Y. (2018). Use of social media platforms to promote library services and profitable librarianship. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 9(7), 324–334.

Booker, L., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2013). How academic libraries can leverage social networking to popularize their services: An empirical study. Journal of the Indiana Academy of the Social Sciences, 16(2), 129–146.

Chitumbo, E. M. M. (2015). Social media tools for academic library services. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 4(9), 33–40.

Connell, R. S. (2008). Academic libraries, Facebook and MySpace, and student outreach: A survey of student opinion. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 9(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.0.0036

Crawford, G. A. (1994). A conjoint analysis of reference services in academic libraries. College & Research Libraries, 257–267. https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/viewFile/14892/16338

Published

2025-07-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

LEVERAGING SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS FOR LIBRARY SERVICES:  A CONJOINT ANALYSIS OF LIBRARY USERS’ PREFERENCES (D. A. Rangnath & G. V. Santosh , Trans.). (2025). Journal of Indian Library Association, 61(02), 243-252. https://doi.org/10.34256/